Membangun Keunggulan Bersaing melalui Kearifan Lokal: Analisis Strategi Bersaing pada "Batik Tulis XYZ"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63200/jebmass.v4i1.236Keywords:
Keunggulan Bersaing; Kearifan Lokal; Sumber Daya Strategis, Industri Kreatif, Batik.Abstract
Penelitian ini menganalisis bagaimana unit usaha mikro dan kecil (UMK) di sektor industri kreatif budaya membangun keunggulan bersaing yang berkelanjutan dengan memobilisasi kearifan lokal (local wisdom) sebagai sumber daya strategis. Melalui pendekatan studi kasus kualitatif yang mendalam pada “Batik Tulis XYZ”, penelitian ini mengeksplorasi mekanisme konversi kearifan lokal menjadi keunggulan kompetitif. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi partisipan, wawancara mendalam dengan pemilik dan pengrajin, serta analisis dokumen. Temuan penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa keunggulan bersaing “Batik Tulis XYZ” tidak bersumber pada strategi generik biaya atau diferensiasi semata, melainkan pada konfigurasi unik tiga elemen kunci: (1) pemanfaatan kearifan lokal sebagai fondasi nilai dan diferensiasi otentik yang menciptakan keunikan produk dan merek; (2) kapabilitas organisasi yang berbasis pengetahuan tacit (tacit knowledge) para pengrajin, yang memfasilitasi inovasi inkremental dan adaptasi berkelanjutan dalam bingkai tradisi; serta (3) jejaring sosial dan kelembagaan yang tertanam (embeddedness) dalam ekosistem budaya lokal, yang memberikan akses eksklusif, legitimasi, dan kontrol sosial atas kualitas. Studi ini berargumen bahwa keunggulan yang dibangun melalui model ini bersifat kompleks, kontekstual, dan sulit ditiru oleh pesaing, sehingga menciptakan sustained competitive advantage (Barney, 1991). Implikasi penelitian menekankan perlunya perspektif strategis yang lebih holistik dan berbasis sumber daya untuk UMK berbasis budaya, yang melihat kearifan lokal tidak hanya sebagai warisan budaya tetapi sebagai strategic asset yang dapat dikelola dan dikembangkan
Downloads
References
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bakar, L. J. A., & Ahmad, H. (2010). Assessing the relationship between firm resources and product innovation performance: A resource-based view. Business Process Management Journal, 16(3), 420–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151011049430
Beverland, M. B. (2005). Crafting brand authenticity: The case of luxury wines. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5), 1003–1029. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00530.x
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
Jack, S. L., & Anderson, A. R. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00076-3
Lampel, J., Lant, T., & Shamsie, J. (2000). Balancing act: Learning from organizing practices in cultural industries. Organization Science, 11(3), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.3.263.12503
Morhart, F., Malär, L., Guèvremont, A., Girardin, F., & Grohmann, B. (2015). Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.11.006
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Doubleday
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.
Ramirez, R. (1999). Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199901)20:1<49::AID-SMJ20>3.0.CO;2-2
Ratten, V. (2020). Entrepreneurial opportunities: Nature, types, and origins. In Entrepreneurial opportunities (pp. 1–17). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44511-5_1
Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In R. B. Lamb (Ed.), Competitive strategic management (pp. 556–570). Prentice-Hall.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
Svelby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing & measuring knowledge-based assets. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393808
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hendra Dwi Prasetyo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract Views: 132
| 
File Views: 92
